Journal article

The appropriacy of averaging in the study of context effects

SX Liew, PDL Howe, DR Little

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review | Published : 2016

Abstract

Models of human decision-making aim to simultaneously explain the similarity, attraction, and compromise effects. However, evidence that people show all three effects within the same paradigm has come from studies in which choices were averaged over participants. This averaging is only justified if those participants show qualitatively similar choice behaviors. To investigate whether this was the case, we repeated two experiments previously run by Trueblood (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 962-968, 2012) and Berkowitsch, Scheibehenne, and Rieskamp (Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143(3), 1331–1348, 2014). We found that individuals displayed qualitative differences in their choice b..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Awarded by Australian Research Council


Funding Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Melbourne Research Grant Support Scheme Grant to Piers Howe, as well as ARC Discovery Project Grant DP120103120 and DP160102360 and a Melbourne Research Grant Support Scheme Grant to Daniel Little. We would also like to thank Jennifer Trueblood and Nicolas Berkowitsch for very generously providing information and data from their studies. In addition, we are grateful to Scott Brown, Jennifer Trueblood, and Sudeep Bhatia for their invaluable comments and suggestions.